Crocs reports fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results today before market open with the stock (NASDAQ:CROX) sitting 30% off it’s 52 week highs leading in. The quarter tests whether the company can stabilize the HEYDUDE brand while defending margins against tariff headwinds and promotional pressure in North America.
Consensus sits at $1.91 adjusted EPS on $916.6M revenue, both representing year-over-year declines of 24% and 7% respectively, yet still above the company’s prior guidance midpoint of $1.87 EPS.
This setup creates a narrow beat/miss window where guidance commentary and 2026 visibility will likely matter more than the quarter’s absolute results.
$4.52B
28.7
$1.91
$916.6M

Crocs reports fourth-quarter results amid ongoing brand portfolio challenges and margin pressures.
The fourth quarter arrives after a year in which Crocs consistently beat adjusted EPS estimates but saw its stock punished for withdrawing full-year guidance and citing macro uncertainty tied to trade policy. Management’s May 2025 decision to pull the full-year outlook, despite delivering a 21% EPS beat in Q1, signaled a credibility shift that forced analysts to widen scenario distributions and lean more heavily on near-term datapoints. By Q3, the company again delivered a 24% EPS beat, yet guided to another year-over-year revenue decline in Q4 and lower profitability versus the prior year, reinforcing that the near-term downcycle was not finished.
The quarter’s substance will hinge on whether tariffs, HEYDUDE wholesale cleanup, and promotional discipline are reaching an inflection point or merely extending into 2026. Consensus EPS has drifted 1.5% lower over the past 30 days, reflecting analysts’ collective reassessment of near-term margin defense. The stock trades at 28.7x trailing earnings, a premium that assumes capital allocation and international growth can offset domestic weakness. A result that merely meets guidance without credible 2026 framework risks compressing that multiple further.
Consensus Estimates
| Metric | Consensus Est. | Range | Prior Guidance | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS (Adjusted) | $1.91 | $1.82 – $1.92 | $1.82 – $1.92 (mid: $1.87) | -24.2% |
| Revenue | $916.6M | $890M – $940M | ~-8% YoY (~$910M implied) | -7.4% |
| Crocs Brand Revenue | $742.6M | N/A | N/A | -2.6% |
| HEYDUDE Revenue | $175.4M | N/A | N/A | -23.0% |
Analysts Covering: 9 (EPS) / 11 (Revenue)
Estimate Revisions (30d): 0 up / modest downward drift
Consensus EPS of $1.91 sits 2% above the midpoint of management’s $1.82 to $1.92 guidance range, a tighter setup than recent quarters where Crocs delivered material upside. The estimate distribution reflects limited conviction that the company will exceed its own framework, particularly given the Q3 commentary that flagged unfavorable duties, tariffs, and higher SG&A investment as ongoing margin pressures. Revenue expectations imply an 8% year-over-year decline, consistent with management’s prior guide, but the composition matters: analysts project HEYDUDE revenue down 23% to $175.4M, with wholesale channels expected to decline 36%, while the core Crocs brand is forecast to decline only 2.6%.
The revision pattern over the past month has been modestly negative, with consensus drifting from $1.93 to $1.91, signaling that analysts are leaning cautious into the event rather than building in upside. This contrasts with the Q3 setup, where consensus sat at $2.36 heading into a $2.92 beat. The current positioning suggests the Street is anchoring on execution risk rather than earnings power, particularly given the company’s track record of beating on EPS while simultaneously guiding conservatively on revenue and margins.

The quarter will reveal whether HEYDUDE’s wholesale cleanup is nearing completion and if the core Crocs brand can sustain pricing discipline.
Management Guidance and Commentary
“We are withdrawing our full-year 2025 outlook due to macro uncertainties stemming from global trade policies.”
Management’s May 2025 decision to withdraw full-year guidance, despite delivering a 21% Q1 EPS beat, marked the inflection point for how the market frames Crocs’ earnings. The withdrawal explicitly tied uncertainty to trade policy, a signal that tariffs had moved from background noise to a material input in the model. By Q2, the company declined to reinstate a full-year framework and instead guided to a Q3 revenue decline of 9% to 11% with an adjusted operating margin of 18% to 19%, citing tariff-related headwinds. That guide was a direct hit to growth expectations and framed duties as an earnings sensitivity rather than a one-time cost.
“Unfavorable duties and tariffs continue to pressure gross margins, alongside higher SG&A investment.”
The Q3 earnings release reinforced this narrative, with SEC filings flagging tariffs as a key driver of gross margin pressure even as the company leaned on cash flow and buybacks to defend the equity story. Management’s Q4 guide of $1.82 to $1.92 adjusted EPS and revenue down approximately 8% year-over-year effectively told investors the near-term downcycle was not finished. The gap between consensus ($1.91) and the guidance midpoint ($1.87) is only 2%, meaning a “clear beat” likely requires both EPS above $1.92 and evidence that revenue or margins are not deteriorating faster than implied.
The bigger stock-moving variable is whether management can credibly reintroduce a broader 2026 framework. The company has now operated without full-year guidance for three quarters, forcing analysts to model on shorter horizons and wider scenario ranges. If Crocs beats Q4 but again declines to provide annual targets, history suggests the stock could struggle despite the beat. Conversely, even an in-line quarter could trade well if management can quantify tariff sensitivity, demonstrate HEYDUDE stabilization, and show margin defense without reigniting promotions.
Analyst Price Targets & Ratings
Wall Street sentiment reflects the uncertainty, with 46% of analysts rating shares a Hold and only 46% recommending Buy or Strong Buy. The consensus target of $89.75 implies modest 8.5% upside from current levels, though targets range widely based on assumptions about HEYDUDE recovery timing and tariff persistence. The rating distribution has shifted more cautious over the past year as analysts grapple with the company’s guidance withdrawal and margin pressures.
Sector & Peer Comparison
| Company | Ticker | Market Cap | P/E | Fwd P/E | Profit Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crocs Inc
⭐ Focus |
CROX | $4.52B | 28.7 | 24.1 | 4.5% |
|
Nike Inc
|
NKE | $108.2B | 22.4 | 20.8 | 10.1% |
|
Skechers USA
|
SKX | $9.8B | 18.3 | 16.2 | 7.2% |
|
Deckers Outdoor
|
DECK | $28.5B | 32.1 | 28.4 | 18.3% |
|
Wolverine World Wide
|
WWW | $1.4B | N/A | 12.5 | -2.1% |
|
Steven Madden
|
SHOO | $2.9B | 14.6 | 13.8 | 8.9% |
Crocs trades at a 28.7x trailing P/E, a premium to Skechers (18.3x) and Steven Madden (14.6x) but below Deckers Outdoor (32.1x), which has sustained higher profit margins through brand heat and pricing power. The company’s 4.5% profit margin sits well below footwear peers, reflecting the HEYDUDE drag and elevated SG&A investment. Crocs’ forward P/E of 24.1x implies the market is pricing in earnings recovery, yet the multiple compresses if 2026 visibility remains limited or if tariffs prove more persistent than anticipated.
The peer set highlights Crocs’ positioning challenge: it lacks the margin profile of Deckers, the diversification of Nike, or the valuation discount of Wolverine. The company’s equity story has historically rested on capital return (buybacks and debt paydown) and international expansion offsetting domestic weakness. A forward P/E above 24x requires confidence that these levers can sustain earnings growth even as revenue declines, a thesis that becomes harder to underwrite without credible full-year guidance.
Earnings Track Record
| Quarter | EPS Actual | EPS Est. | Result | Surprise % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | $2.92 | $2.36 | Beat | +23.7% |
| Q2 2025 | $4.23 | $4.02 | Beat | +5.2% |
| Q1 2025 | $3.00 | $2.49 | Beat | +20.5% |
| Q4 2024 | $2.52 | $2.26 | Beat | +11.5% |
| Q3 2024 | $3.60 | $3.11 | Beat | +15.8% |
| Q2 2024 | $4.01 | $3.56 | Beat | +12.6% |
| Q1 2024 | $3.02 | $2.23 | Beat | +35.4% |
| Q4 2023 | $2.58 | $2.37 | Beat | +8.9% |
Crocs has beaten adjusted EPS estimates in 19 of the last 20 quarters, with an average surprise of 15.6%. The most recent four quarters delivered beats ranging from 5.2% to 23.7%, yet the stock’s reaction increasingly decoupled from the magnitude of the beat as investors focused on guidance and visibility. Q1 2025’s 21% beat was followed by muted trading after the company withdrew full-year outlook. Q2’s 5% beat triggered a 26% single-session decline after management guided to Q3 revenue down 9% to 11% and cited tariff headwinds. Q3’s 24% beat produced a sharp initial rally, but the stock faded as the Q4 guide pointed to continued year-over-year revenue declines.
The pattern is clear: execution versus consensus has been strong, but the market is no longer paying for beats when guidance remains cautious or visibility deteriorates. The current setup, with consensus only 2% above the guidance midpoint, suggests analysts have learned this lesson and are anchoring on the company’s own framework rather than building in upside. A beat above $1.92 would represent the high end of guidance, but without credible 2026 commentary, history suggests the reaction could still be muted.
Post-Earnings Price Movement History
| Date | Surprise | EPS vs Est. | Next Day Move | Price Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | +23.7% | $2.92 vs $2.36 | +1.5% | $83.76 → $85.00 |
| Q2 2025 | +5.2% | $4.23 vs $4.02 | +4.0% | $103.02 → $107.13 |
| Q1 2025 | +20.5% | $3.00 vs $2.49 | +3.0% | $105.99 → $109.14 |
| Q4 2024 | +11.5% | $2.52 vs $2.26 | +1.2% | $108.71 → $110.03 |
| Q3 2024 | +15.8% | $3.60 vs $3.11 | -1.9% | $144.31 → $141.63 |
Crocs’ average next-day move following earnings is 1.4%, with beats averaging 1.6% and the single miss in recent history producing a 0.3% gain. The data reveals a pattern where initial reactions have become increasingly muted despite large EPS beats. Q3 2025’s 24% surprise generated only a 1.5% next-day gain, while Q2’s 5% beat initially lifted the stock 4% before the guidance commentary triggered a 26% decline in the same session. Q3 2024’s 16% beat was followed by a 1.9% decline, illustrating that guidance and forward visibility have consistently overridden reported results.
The historical pattern suggests the options market’s implied move (discussed below) may understate intraday volatility but overstate sustained directional moves. The stock has shown a tendency to gap on the open based on the EPS print, then reverse or extend based on management’s commentary during the call. Investors positioning for this quarter should anticipate that the initial reaction to a beat or miss may not hold if guidance disappoints or surprises.
Expected Move & Implied Volatility
52%
68%
38%
The options market is pricing a 6.8% move in either direction, implying a range of $77.11 to $88.35. Implied volatility of 52% sits at the 68th percentile of its one-year range, indicating elevated uncertainty relative to historical norms. The gap between implied volatility (52%) and 30-day historical volatility (38%) suggests the market is pricing in event risk beyond what recent trading patterns would imply. This premium likely reflects uncertainty around guidance, tariff quantification, and HEYDUDE trajectory rather than confidence in a large directional move.
The 6.8% expected move is materially larger than the 1.4% average next-day move observed in recent history, but consistent with the intraday volatility seen in Q2 2025 when the stock initially rose on a beat before declining 26% on guidance. The IV percentile of 68% indicates options sellers are demanding higher premiums than usual, a signal that institutional positioning reflects caution rather than conviction.

Management’s ability to articulate a credible 2026 framework will determine whether the stock can sustain its valuation premium.
Expert Predictions & What to Watch
Key Outlook: Cautiously Bearish
The fourth quarter will determine whether current challenges represent temporary headwinds addressable through operational improvements or signal deeper brand fatigue requiring fundamental strategy shifts. Management has now operated without full-year guidance for three consecutive quarters, forcing analysts to model on shorter horizons and wider scenario ranges. The Street’s modest downward revision of consensus from $1.93 to $1.91 over the past month reflects collective reassessment rather than panic, but the positioning suggests limited upside is priced in.
Key Metrics to Watch
The quarter’s outcome will hinge on whether management can shift the narrative from “executing through uncertainty” to “demonstrating visibility.” A beat on EPS combined with HEYDUDE stabilization and credible 2026 guidance would support the bull case and potentially drive the stock toward $95. Conversely, an in-line result with continued guidance conservatism and accelerating HEYDUDE declines would reinforce the bear case and likely push the stock toward $70 to $75. The options market’s 6.8% implied move reflects this binary setup, where guidance commentary will determine whether the stock sustains any initial reaction to the reported numbers.
Searching for the Perfect Broker?
Discover our top-recommended brokers for trading stocks, forex, cryptos, and beyond. Dive in and test their capabilities with complimentary demo accounts today!
- eToro Wide range of instruments available to trade – Read our Review
- XTB UK regulated by the FCA – Read our Review
- BlackBull 26,000+ Shares, Options, ETFs, Bonds, and other underlying assets – Read our Review
YOUR CAPITAL IS AT RISK. 76% OF RETAIL CFD ACCOUNTS LOSE MONEY