Fluor’s stock price (NYSE:FLR) has begun 2026 in fine form, adding 9.06% to sit near support ahead of earnings. The company reports fourth-quarter 2025 results this morning (February 17) before market open.
Expectations for the quarter sit at $0.45 EPS and $4.20B revenue, both below the implied fourth-quarter run rate needed to reach the midpoint, creating upside potential if execution sustains the post-second-quarter recovery trajectory.
The setup tests execution credibility rather than demand visibility. Fluor cut full-year 2025 adjusted EPS guidance to $1.95–$2.15 on August 1 after disclosing cost growth on three infrastructure projects, then raised the range to $2.10–$2.25 on November 7 as third-quarter results stabilized.
The stock dropped 27% on the August guide cut, establishing guidance credibility as the primary stock-mover rather than quarterly EPS volatility. Fourth-quarter results will either validate the repair narrative or force analysts to haircut 2026 estimates if new execution issues emerge.
$7.35B
2.3
$0.45
$4.20B
Recent contract wins in nuclear fuel infrastructure (Centrus Energy uranium enrichment expansion) and large-scale mining (Donlin Gold feasibility study) support the long-term positioning narrative, but these awards remain early-stage and will not materially affect fourth-quarter reported results.
The immediate question is whether Fluor can deliver operating cash flow within the raised $250–$300M full-year guidance and avoid any incremental project cost disclosures that would undermine the November framework.
Consensus Estimates
| Metric | Consensus Est. | Range | Prior Guidance | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS (Adjusted) | $0.45 | $0.41 – $0.56 | $2.10 – $2.25 (FY25) | -11.8% |
| Revenue | $4.20B | $3.25B – $4.73B | Not specified | +2.5% |
Analysts Covering: 8 analysts (EPS) / 7 analysts (Revenue)
Estimate Revisions (30d): 0 up / 0 down
The fourth-quarter EPS estimate of $0.45 implies a sequential decline from third-quarter adjusted EPS of $0.68, consistent with typical fourth-quarter seasonality in engineering and construction work. More importantly, the $0.45 consensus sits below the implied run rate needed to reach management’s raised full-year midpoint of $2.18, given year-to-date adjusted EPS through third quarter of approximately $1.84 (sum of $0.73, $0.43, and $0.68). This positioning creates asymmetric upside if Fluor delivers results that confirm the November guidance framework without requiring a fourth-quarter beat to reach the midpoint.
Revenue consensus of $4.20B represents modest year-over-year growth but sits within a wide estimate range ($3.25B–$4.73B), reflecting uncertainty around project timing and the distortive effect of the third-quarter Santos legal reversal, which depressed reported revenue by approximately $600M. The absence of estimate revisions over the past 30 days suggests analysts are anchoring to management’s November commentary rather than adjusting for incremental data points, making guidance the primary information event rather than the quarterly print itself.

Fluor Corporation headquarters in Irving, Texas – the company tests execution credibility with fourth-quarter results after mid-year guidance reset
Management Guidance and Commentary
“We are pleased with our third quarter results which reflect the strength of our diversified portfolio and our team’s continued focus on execution. Based on our performance year-to-date and our outlook for the remainder of the year, we are raising our full year 2025 guidance for adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS and operating cash flow.”
Management’s November 7 guidance raise followed third-quarter adjusted EPS of $0.68 versus $0.44 consensus, signaling that the second-quarter infrastructure issues were contained rather than systemic. The raised full-year adjusted EPS range of $2.10–$2.25 (midpoint $2.18) represents a partial recovery from the August cut to $1.95–$2.15 (midpoint $2.05) but remains below the original $2.25–$2.75 range maintained through first quarter. The trajectory establishes a clear test: can Fluor close 2025 within the November framework without introducing new execution concerns that would force another reset.
Operating cash flow guidance moved to $250–$300M from the prior $200–$250M range, a metric that carries outsized weight in engineering and construction names when investors are pressure-testing earnings quality and working-capital dynamics. The raise suggests improved project billings and collections rather than merely accounting-driven profitability, addressing a key concern that emerged during the August guide cut when management cited both cost growth and client hesitancy on project awards.
The gap between consensus fourth-quarter EPS of $0.45 and the implied requirement to reach guidance midpoint creates a setup where management can deliver a “beat” by simply confirming the November ranges rather than needing to exceed them. This positioning reflects how Fluor’s estimate story over the past 12 months has been driven by guidance resets rather than quarter-to-quarter surprises, with the August cut and November raise functioning as the primary stock-moving events rather than reported EPS variances.
Analyst Price Targets & Ratings
Wall Street remains cautiously positioned on Fluor, with 50% of analysts rating shares a Hold following the August guidance cut and subsequent recovery. The consensus target of $50.50 implies 11% upside from current levels, though the wide distribution of ratings reflects uncertainty about execution sustainability versus the attractive valuation at current levels.
Sector & Peer Comparison
| Company | Ticker | Market Cap | P/E | Fwd P/E | Profit Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Fluor Corporation
⭐ Focus |
FLR | $7.35B | 2.3 | N/A | 21.7% |
|
Jacobs Solutions
|
J | $16.8B | 18.5 | 14.2 | 5.8% |
|
AECOM
|
ACM | $12.4B | 16.9 | 13.8 | 4.2% |
|
Quanta Services
|
PWR | $42.1B | 28.4 | 22.1 | 7.3% |
|
MasTec
|
MTZ | $8.9B | 24.7 | 18.3 | 3.1% |
Fluor trades at a P/E of 2.3x versus the engineering and construction peer average of approximately 22x, an extreme valuation discount that reflects market skepticism about earnings sustainability rather than current profitability. The 21.7% profit margin appears artificially elevated due to distortions from NuScale mark-to-market effects and the Santos legal reversal in recent quarters, making the metric less comparable to peers on a reported basis. The valuation disconnect creates a binary setup: either the market is correctly pricing in a high probability of further execution issues that will force earnings downgrades, or Fluor represents a value opportunity if management can demonstrate consistent execution within guided ranges.

Fluor’s modern corporate campus reflects the company’s position in large-scale infrastructure and engineering projects
Earnings Track Record
| Quarter | EPS Actual | EPS Est. | Result | Surprise % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | $0.68 | $0.46 | Beat | +47.8% |
| Q2 2025 | $0.43 | $0.56 | Miss | -23.2% |
| Q1 2025 | $0.73 | $0.51 | Beat | +44.0% |
| Q4 2024 | $0.48 | $0.77 | Miss | -38.0% |
| Q3 2024 | $0.51 | $0.76 | Miss | -32.9% |
| Q2 2024 | $0.85 | $0.68 | Beat | +25.0% |
| Q1 2024 | $0.47 | $0.54 | Miss | -13.0% |
| Q4 2023 | $0.68 | $0.57 | Beat | +19.3% |
The 45% beat rate over the past 20 quarters establishes a pattern of execution inconsistency rather than reliable outperformance, with large positive surprises (Q3 2023 at +82.1%, Q2 2023 at +76.7%) offset by significant misses (Q4 2024 at -38.0%, Q3 2024 at -32.9%). The recent four-quarter sequence (Q4 2024 miss, Q1 2025 beat, Q2 2025 miss, Q3 2025 beat) demonstrates the whipsaw effect that has characterized Fluor’s results, making guidance credibility more important than quarterly surprise direction for stock performance.
Post-Earnings Price Movement History
| Date | Surprise | EPS vs Est. | Next Day Move | Price Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | +47.8% | $0.68 vs $0.46 | +0.5% | $42.64 → $42.86 |
| Q2 2025 | -23.2% | $0.43 vs $0.56 | -2.2% | $51.42 → $50.31 |
| Q1 2025 | +44.0% | $0.73 vs $0.51 | +0.4% | $36.19 → $36.35 |
| Q4 2024 | -38.0% | $0.48 vs $0.77 | -0.1% | $49.34 → $49.27 |
| Q3 2024 | -32.9% | $0.51 vs $0.76 | -2.0% | $47.89 → $46.92 |
The muted average next-day price reactions (0.0% overall, +0.5% on beats, -0.2% on misses) mask the reality that Fluor’s most significant stock moves occur on guidance changes rather than earnings surprises. The August 1, 2025 second-quarter report triggered a 27% single-day decline despite the EPS miss being only 23.2%, demonstrating that the guidance cut to $1.95–$2.15 from $2.25–$2.75 drove the stock reaction rather than the quarterly result itself.
Expected Move & Implied Volatility
38.2%
62%
31.4%
The options-implied move of 6.5% significantly exceeds the historical average next-day reaction of near zero, indicating the market is pricing elevated uncertainty around the fourth-quarter result despite muted recent post-earnings volatility. The 38.2% implied volatility sits at the 62nd percentile of its historical range, suggesting moderately elevated expectations for price movement without reaching extreme levels.

Fluor’s corporate facilities represent decades of engineering expertise in complex infrastructure projects worldwide
Expert Predictions & What to Watch
Key Outlook: Cautiously Bullish on Guidance Confirmation
Key Metrics to Watch
Searching for the Perfect Broker?
Discover our top-recommended brokers for trading stocks, forex, cryptos, and beyond. Dive in and test their capabilities with complimentary demo accounts today!
- eToro Wide range of instruments available to trade – Read our Review
- XTB UK regulated by the FCA – Read our Review
- BlackBull 26,000+ Shares, Options, ETFs, Bonds, and other underlying assets – Read our Review
YOUR CAPITAL IS AT RISK. 76% OF RETAIL CFD ACCOUNTS LOSE MONEY